The photometric data given in the Hipparcos Input Catalogue
are derived from a wide variety of sources. The correspondence between
the letters used in field 19 and the source of the photometry, along
with the number of stars whose photometry was taken from this source,
is given in Table B2
.
[]
Stars were proposed for Hipparcos observation on the grounds of
their scientific interest, irrespective of the accuracy of available
data on position or photometry. The photometric data given by the
proposers were taken either from the SIMBAD data base or from various
sources of very heterogeneous quality. Of the 214000
proposed stars,
photoelectric photometry was
available for about 26000 stars, while approximate
photographic photometry was available for about 32000 other stars.
In addition, it was possible to derive acceptable
and
magnitudes from the available estimates of blue and visual magnitudes
for some 139000 stars. For the remaining 17000 stars, the
photometric information was not reliable. These stars belonged
primarily to the faint end of the proposed programmes. The
observational effort was concentrated on stars having a high
probability of being finally retained in the Input Catalogue
considering the results of the successive numerical simulations of the
mission. The observing lists were updated after each simulation.
As for positional data, the data given in fields 25-31 are the result of extensive compilations (Mermilliod & Mermilliod 1985; Egret 1985; Grenon 1989a), and new observations (Grenon 1985a, 1988a, 1988b; Torra et al. 1988). The photometric contents of the INCA data base, initially identical to those of SIMBAD, were updated in successive steps:
and
magnitudes (Johnson system) and the
magnitudes were computed from the data collected in the GCPD
for various multi-colour photometric systems after a determination of
the transformation formulae from these systems to the Johnson and
Hipparcos systems (Grenon 1985b). Identifiers used in the GCPD were
incorporated into the INCA data base, facilitating the inclusion of
the
,
and
magnitudes;
,
, [M/H]) in addition to the
magnitudes. The selection was made as follows (Grenon 1985a):

All observations were published separately, and only the
resulting
,
and
magnitudes are given here. They represent the result of
the combined effort of astronomers from Belgium, Denmark, France,
Germany, The Netherlands, Spain and Switzerland (Grenon 1989a). The
data were introduced into the INCA data base following the same
procedure as for the compiled photoelectric data described above. Among
these new observations, special mention should be made of the visual
magnitudes obtained by the Carlsberg Automatic Meridian Circle at La
Palma: it provides magnitudes in a band similar to the Johnson
and with an accuracy only slightly lower than that achieved
with classical photometric techniques. The magnitudes published in the
Carlsberg Catalogues Vols 1-3 (1985, 1986, 1987) were reduced to
Johnson
using a colour term derived from the spectral
type, and were retained when no other photoelectric data were
available;
and
magnitudes were not identical, the more reliable
magnitude was retained, and the colour of the stars was computed from
the spectral type and a newly-derived extinction model (Arenou
et al. 1992);